tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11874540.post115273927827581919..comments2023-12-25T01:26:27.096-07:00Comments on Radical Goddess Thealogy: THE Wrong MOUSE HOLEAthanahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02037246663178726395noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11874540.post-1153448156883817862006-07-20T20:15:00.000-06:002006-07-20T20:15:00.000-06:00Yes, but by accepting the whole for its few good b...Yes, but by accepting the whole for its few good bits (if there are any) they make room for the literalists to impose the many, many bad bits on the rest of us. <BR/><BR/>I haven't seen a version yet that edits out the horrid parts. There are newer versions that water down the dangerous stuff, but not enough to make it harmless. <BR/><BR/>I've been debating with some Christians lately, liberal Morgainehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13074112467402675609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11874540.post-1152924289980042142006-07-14T18:44:00.000-06:002006-07-14T18:44:00.000-06:00Eruvande, as long as liberal Christians keep the b...Eruvande, as long as liberal Christians keep the bible as their holy book, they’re putting their stamp of approval on it. Does a school keep a textbook if it finds “only three good statements” in it? Would a surgeon learn surgery from a book with “only three good statements” in it? Would a critic do anything but pan a book with “only three good statements” in it? Would you form a religion andAthanahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02037246663178726395noreply@blogger.com